IMPLANT-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION
Overview
-
Evolution of implant-based breast reconstruction largely secondary to:
-
Earlier detection of lower stage breast cancer through screening
-
More conservative surgical resections of breast cancer​
-
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies
-
Increasing recognition of the value of immediate reconstruction
-
Development of ADMs
-
Option of expander-implant
-
BREAST AUGMENTATION
Patient selection
-
Examination:
-
Bra cup size
-
Ptosis
-
Measurements (SN-N, N-N, N-IMF)
-
Skin quality and scars
-
General examination
-
-
Photographs
-
External gel “bra” sizers
-
Good to give the patient an estimation of volume
-
-
Pocket selection
-
Type of mastectomy (How much skin is left?):
-
Simple mastectomy
-
Skin sparing mastectomy
-
Nipple sparing mastectomy
-
-
Adjuvant radiotherapy?
-
What tissues available for internal pocket?
​​
-
-
Techniques
-
2-stage expander-implant reconstruction
-
1st stage - Immediate insertion of deflated expander in subpectoral pocket post mastectomy
-
Interim - Expansion as outpatient
-
2nd stag - Replacement of expander with implant
-
-
1-stage "direct to implant" subpectoral reconstruction
-
​Implant placed directly into subpectoral pocket after SSM/NSM with ADM as inferior pocket
-
Advantages:
-
Additional protection against implant extrusion
-
Decrease in rippling
-
-
Disadvantages:
-
Deficiencies in upper pole contour
-
Animation deformity
-
Increased postoperative pain and recovery
-
-
-
1-stage "direct to implant" prepectoral reconstruction
-
​Implant placed directly into prepectoral pocket after SSM/NSM with ADM as pocket through “wrapping” or “tenting”
-
Improved understanding of mastectomy planes
-
Advances in biological mesh technology
-
Advantages:
-
Reduces postoperative pain
-
Lower risk of animation
​​
-
-